7.
2
withholden by the Authorities making it from the persons on whom they profited to make it; and that, by being kept so long in the dark, as to the existence of such a demand the latter are at this moment obnoxious to the serious misconstructions of the public, in respect of their long and unexplained reticence in the presence of such a demand.
Very
It is equally obvious that the non-publication at Hong Kong of a document meant for instantaneous publication here, and the entire ignorance of the Community there of the very existence of such a document, must have again prevented the expression on its part of any dissent from the views signified by His Excellency, in the "Despatch" or letter in question, more than one paragraph strangely represents to be in entire conformity - as those signified on former occasion were said to be - with the views of the Community in general and of every person who ever resided in China.
and in
A.
oni
Your Memorialists do not doubt that this method of suppressing in the Colony, and also from Your Memorialists, and at the same time publishing to the world, a paper which contains, at the demand of satisfaction of personal injury with honor, the pretended reply to the main articles of accusation against the local Government presented by the late Memorial will be regarded by your Lordship neither as regular in respect to the traditions of Your Department, nor as satisfactory, nor as itself compensatory for the extraordinary silence which with regard to their well-founded and respectful complaints of Colonial mal-administration.
Very
your
J
9.
10.
Th
11
(four predecessor appears to have considered it to have been his duty to pursue.
to enter.
Into the possible reasons which may hereafter be alleged in palliation, if not in defence, of the proceedings of which they complain, they do not pretend.
It is very possible that their endeavours to conjecture those reasons might be misguided and therefore thrown away. They have also now the satisfaction to think that they can better attain the information which they seek upon that part of the case by asking Your Lordship to afford it: unanswered
Before they conclude, your Memorialists desire to add to their former and in yet altogether Memorial a few remarks upon the pretended reply to it which is offered by the accompanying or indeed it be genuine - so-called "Despatch" or "Letter" of October 20th, 1868.
In the first place, they draw Your Lordship's attention to the fact that the Appendix to which the paper in question professes to refer as evidence of the truth of its statements has been excluded from the printed Copy sent; an omission of some significance, because the Governor's accompanying "Financial Statement for 1869", of which that supposed "Appendix" is there stated to contain Extracts, and which had reached this October 1868 the hands of Your Memorialists through quite another channel, so far from supporting the statements in question, furnished the strongest proofs of their inaccuracy and of the facility of the arguments, founded upon them, by which the Hong Kong Government pretend to impeach the truth and justice of the original complaint of your Memorialists; viz., that the measures
I that upon one point?
Goverment
$
7.
2
withholden by the Authorities making it from the
whom they proftfeed persons on
to make it; and = that, by being kept so long in the dark, as to the existence of such a demand the latter are at this moment obnoxions to the
serious misconstructions. of the public, in respect of their long and unexplained reticence in the presence of such a demand.
Very
It is equally obvious that the non-publications at Hong Kong of a document mcant for instantaneous publication here, and the entire ignorance of the Community there of the very existence of such a document, must have again prevented the expression on its part of any
dissent & from the views signified by His Excellencef, in the "Despatch " or better in
letter in question. more than one paragraph strangely represcate to be in entire conformity - as those signified jouner occasion were said to be with the views Community in general and of every person whe ever resided in China.
and in
A.
oni
Your Memorialists do not doubt that this method of suppressing in the Colony, and also from Your Memorialists, and at the same time publishing to the world, paper which contains, at the Danv
demand of satisfaction of personal hiney with honor, the pectended reply to the main articles of accusation against the local Government presented t by the late Memorial will be regarded by yout Pordship neither as regular in respect to the traditions of Your Department, nor at satisfactory
: satisfactory as itself not yet að compensatory for the
cxtraordinary silence which with regard to their will founded and respectful complaints of Colerial mal-administration
Vexy
your
J
9.
10.
Th
11
(four predecesser appears to have considered it to have been his duty to pursue.
to enter.
Into the possible reasons which
may hereafter be alleged in palliation, if not in defence, of the s proceedings of which they complain, they do not pretend.
It is very possible that their endeavours to confècture those reasons might be misguided and therefore thrown away. They have also now the a patisfactions to think that they can better attain the information which they seek upon that part of the case by asking Your Lordship to afford it:
unanswered
Before they conclude, your Memorialists desire to add to their former and in yet altogether. Manorial a four remarks apour the pretended reply. to it which is offered by the accompamping bef indeed it be genuine of the so called "Der
Letter of "October 20* 1868
f
In the first place they draw the Your Lordship to the fact that the Appendix' to which the paper in question professes to refer as evidence of the bruth of its statements has been excluded from the printed Copy sent; an omission of some significance.
because the Govenor's accompamping "Financial Statement
#to
Pinted By for 1809 of which that supposed "Appendiy is there
stated to contain Extracts, and which had reached
this. October 1908 the hands of Your Memorialists through quite another
Legestation
channel, so far from supporting the statemento question furnished the strongest proofs of their inaccuracy and of the factility of the arguments, founded repon their, by which the Hong Kong Government pretend to impeach the truth and jewtice of the original complaint of your Memorialists; viz.
that the measures
I that
upon one point?
Govermen
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.